This International Labor Day, L.I.C must be brought to book!
Dear friends,
Today should be the day of reckoning for L.I.C of India, our ex-employer, which has unjustly deprived us of our rightful dues, since more than two decades. It must come to its senses today, wake up and undo its wrong-doing towards us. Will this International Labor Day prove to be lucky for us, or just fade away into History like the past ones?
All of us must unite and collectively fight for our legal dues, with all our might. Let's wake up the sleeping giant!
Priya
P.S. This post was carried nearly verbatim, last year too, on this day! How many more of such International Labor Days must pass by, for L.I.C to come to its senses, undo its wrongdoings and bestow justice; regard the Supreme Court's judgments for a change?
It's high time that the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister stepped in, to put in a strong word for the long-suffering, resigning ex-employees.
Now that the concerned agencies are cracking a whip on the white-collar criminals, why not do the same with L.I.C? After all, it has been illegally repudiating our dues regularly, since 1997!
Consider this extract from a Supreme Court judgment, in 2007:
SC - "Proviso of Para 3 is struck sown ultra vires"
K. S. Raina. - ------------Petitioner.
Versus
Union of India and others. --------Respondents.
Coram:
The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajiv Sharma, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting?* Yes.
For the Petitioner: Ms. Ranjana Parmar, Advocate.
For Respondent No. 1: Ms. Shilpa Sood,
Central Government Counsel.
For Respondents No. 2 & 3: Mr. Ashwani Sharma, Advocate.
Rajiv Sharma, J.
It has come in the supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of respondent No. 2 that the wage revision of the employees of the nationalized insurance companies follows a periodicity of five years, i.e. 1st August 1987, 1st August 1992, 1st August 1997 and 1st August 2002. Thus, it is evident that in normal circumstances wage revision should have taken place in the year 2002 instead of 2005.
Classification made by the employer on the basis of seeking premature retirement on the basis of two sets of retirement schemes is not sustainable being irrational and discriminatory.
The petitioner has a constitutional right to get his pay including the revision in the pay scale and it is settled law by law the fundamental rights can neither be waived off nor bartered away.
In the present case the petitioner was in fact in employment as on 1st August 2002, the date from which the Notification (Annexure P-4) dated 21st December 2005 has been made applicable.
Consequently, in view of the observations made above, send proviso of Para 3 of the Notification dated 21st December 2005 is struck sown being ultra vires to the extent it deprives the petitioner and other similarly situated persons to get the benefit of revised pay scale with effect from 1st August 2002 after applying the principle of severability.
According, the petition is allowed. The petitioner is held entitled to get the revised pay scale corresponding to his post he was occupying as on 1st August 2002 till 15th March 2004. The respondents are directed to work out the arrears etc. within six weeks from today.
December 3, 2007 (Rajiv Sharma), J.
****************************************************************************************************************************
Source: Supreme Court and High Court judgments relating to Insurance.
No comments:
Post a Comment