The Right to Information Act, 2005
Appeal/Complaint before
Central Information Commission
Appeal No. Dated 27-03-2013
[For office use only]
As I
am aggrieved by the decision of the First Appellate
Authority, I hereby file this Second
Appeal/Complaint for your kind decision.
1. Details of appellant:
1.1 Full Name: --Mrs. Priya Ramesh Swaminathan
1.2. Full Address:
1.3 Phone/Cell No.: -2065100198/9850019553
2. Details of Central Public Information Officer
(CPIO):
2.1 Name/Designation: Ms. Saroj S. Dikhale, ED(RTI/NPRJ), CPIO, CO, LIC of
India
2.2 Full Address: Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Central Office, RTI
Department
5th Floor (West
Wing),
‘Yogakshema’ Bldg.,
P.O.Box No.19953,
Jeevan Bima Marg, Nariman
Point,
Mumbai-400021
2.3 Name of Public Authority: Life Insurance
Corporation of India ( L.I.C. of India )
3.1 Name/Designation of the FAA: Mr.
Sushobhan Sarkar, MD, First Appellate Authority, CO, LIC of India
3.2 Full Address of FAA: Life Insurance Corporation of India,
Central Office, RTI
Department
5th Floor (West
Wing), ‘Yogakshema’
Bldg.,
P.O.Box No.19953,
Jeevan Bima
Marg, Nariman point,
Mumbai-400021
4. Dates of RTI application/First Appeal: Please
refer to my Second Appeal to the CIC dt. 25-06-2012
4.1 To CPIO, CO: My RTI Application dt.
11-02-2012 was forwarded to the CPIO, CO,
by the CPIO, WZO,
ON DECISION BY THE IC DT.04-01-2013. The CO recd. it from the
CPIO, WZO, on 16-01-2013.
4.2 To FAA: 19-02-2013 & mailed on: 25-02-2013 by Speed Post.
5. Particulars of Decisions:
5.1 Reference No & Date of CPIO’s (CO)
Decision:
CO/RTI/AAD/958 dt. 06-02-2013
5.2 Reference No & Date of FAA’s
(CO)
Decision: CO/RTI/AAD dt. 16-03-2013
5.3 Date/s of personal hearing by FAA: Nil
6. Dates of receipt of replies by appellant from:
6.1
CPIO: 14-02-2013
6.2
FAA: 21-03-2013
7. Details of information
sought:
1. What is the
official reason, because of which my arrears payment and difference in
retirement benefits were repudiated during Wage Revision payment in the latest
Wage Revision Charter dated 11th October, 2010?
2.Kindly provide me a copy of the gazette and
official notification, along with information about which specific provisions
of the gazette and official notification justify or state that I should not be
given the arrears due w.e.f August 2007?
3.Please furnish me a copy of Names, Addresses,
Telephone/Mobile nos., Branch Nos., Branch addresses, D.O. Nos. and D.O.
addresses of all the employees of LIC of India, who were denied arrears’
payment under the Charter dated 11th October, 2010.
4.Were any of the above employees paid the arrears
amount by LIC of India? If so, why, when
and by whom? Names and other details as in (3) above, to be furnished.
Documentary proof to be provided by LIC of India.
5.Is there any case filed by any such employee,
whose arrears’ payment was repudiated by LIC of India, against LIC of India; in
respect of any such Charter. If so,
details about the case—Name of the appellant, B.O. and D.O. addresses,
residential and official address, telephone/mobile no., Charter Date (in
respect of any such charter, including the latest one) and copy of the
judgement.
6.What was the outcome of the case as in (5)
above? Documentary proof to be provided
by the LIC of India.
7.No. of resigning employees all over India and the
total amount repudiated (of arrears’ payment by LIC of India) with bifurcation
in respect of each such employee; in the Charter dated 11th October,
2010 applicable w.e.f August 2007.
8.No. of employees, names, addresses telephone/mobile
nos. and amounts repudiated respectively (in respect of each one) under all the
Charters of Wage Revisions (Previous 5 Charters, excluding the latest one) and
their Branch Nos., Addresses of Branches, D.O. Nos., Addresses of D.O.s also to
be provided.
9.Since which year or which Charter has LIC of
India started repudiating arrears’ payment legitimately due, to its resigning
employees; and why?
10.Details of the exact legal provisions and
clauses on the bases of which LIC of India has arrived at its premise of
refusing to pay Arrears’ payment and subsequent difference in retirement
benefits to its resigning employees.
11.Who takes this crucial decision to repudiate
arrears’ payment to the employees? The
Government of India or LIC of India? Details
to be provided with documentary proof.
12.The total no. of transactions effected under my
S.R. No. 441595 from 1st August, 2007 to 2nd July, 2010,
the last date of my service in LIC of India.
13.Copy of the note or letter put up to the
Chairman, LIC of India for the final decision regarding my resignation.
14.Copy of the final approval of my resignation by
LIC of India.
15.Documents pertaining to the Board Meetings of
LIC of India wherein this resolution to repudiate arrears of resigning
employees; has been taken. Kindly provide Minutes of the Meetings with
signatures of all the attending members.
16.With reference to my representation letters
dated 20-10-2010 (addressed to the Executive Director, Personnel, LIC of India)
and 20-11-2010 (addressed to the Chairman, LIC of India), sent through Speed
Post and subsequent e-mails dated 22-10-10, 26-10-10, 01-11-10, 08-11-10,
13-11-10, 16-11-10, 20-11-10, 27-11-10, 04-12-2010, 06-12-2010, 09-12-2010,
13-12-2010, 21-12-2010, 24-12-2010, 25-12-2010, 30-12-2010, 04-01-2011,
13-01-2011, 17-01-2011, 28-01-2011, 31-01-2011, 08-02-2011; why were they not
replied to immediately? Why was there an
inordinate delay of 8 months for a single line unsatisfactory reply vide letter
received by me on 07-06-2011, that too replied to; not by the addressees of my
letters, but by the lower office (Pune Divisional Office No.1)? Kindly provide an explanation letter.
17.Copy of the LIC of India, Staff Regulations,
1960 and subsequent modifications/amendments therein, if any.
18.Names, phone numbers and official addresses of
the current Chairman, Officiating Chairman, Executive Directors, Managing
Directors and Sr. Divisional Manager of Pune Divisional Office 1; LIC of India
19.Please
provide a list of applicants for Wage Revision arrears’ payments in respect of
the Charter dated 11th October, 2010 during the last 16 months,
giving names, dates of application and dates on which replies were issued by
LIC of India.
20.
What are the factors due to which the Wage Revision Charter is delayed
inordinately, every time that it is legitimately due?
21.
a) Does the LIC of India, Staff Regulations, 1960 and
subsequent modifications/amendments therein, if any, contain any
clause wherein it is mentioned that arrears payment after Wage Revision due to
a Charter notification, may be denied to an employee on roll of the LIC of India in the period for which the
Charter has been announced?
b) If so, kindly point out the requisite
provision or clause with adequate, satisfactory explanation/rationale.
c) Does this denial of arrears payment
and difference in retirement benefits, agree in principle, with the labour laws
applicable in India?
**************************************************************************************
8. Brief
facts of the case: The
IC, Smt. Deepak Sandhu, through her Decision dated 04-01-2013, had directed the
CPIO, WZO, Sri. K.Rajivan Nair, to forward as per the provisions of Section 6
(3) of the Act, points 3, 15 and 21 of my RTI Application dt. 11-02-2012, to
the CPIO, Central Office; for replies.
9. Reasons/grounds for this
appeal:
I am not at all satisfied with the replies
of the CPIO, (CO) and the First Appellate Authority.
(CO)
Please note the point-wise details:
Query no. 3. Please
furnish me a copy of Names, Addresses, Telephone/Mobile nos., Branch Nos.,
Branch addresses, D.O. Nos. and D.O. addresses of all the employees of LIC of
India, who were denied arrears’ payment under the Charter dated 11th
October, 2010.
The CPIO, (CO),
Ms. Saroj
S. Dikhale, ED(RTI/NPRJ), LIC of India and the First Appellate Authority.
(CO),
Mr. Sushobhan Sarkar, MD,
LIC of India; in reply to query no. 3
have again stated what was stated by the CPIO, (WZO), Sri K. Rajivan Nair
(Regional Manager, CRM/CPIO) and the First Appellate Authority, (WZO), Sri
R.R.Dash (Zonal Manager, WZO) in their earlier replies to my RTI queries.
In my opinion, it
is just not possible that a reputed Public Sector Authority like the LIC of
India, doesn’t have the requisite records. As I have already stated in my
Second Appeal to the CIC, dt. 25-06-2012, the Central Office of LIC of India is
the main office which has all records pertaining to all its subsidiary
Divisional and Branch offices, etc. in a fully computerized format. It is interesting to note that LIC OF INDIA
is the SECOND LARGEST PUBLIC SECTOR ENTERPRISE THAT IS FULLY COMPUTERIZED!
(after the Indian Railways).
Since details of
resigning employees would have been reflected in the Audit and Inspection
Records of the Central Office, (as billions of rupees have been repudiated), as
well in LIC’s Balance Sheet which is
placed before the Parliament for ratification by the Central Government, each
year; it can be concluded that LIC of India is just evading a reply, for
reasons best known to it.
The CPIO, (CO),
Ms. Saroj
S. Dikhale, ED(RTI/NPRJ), LIC of India has given the details of only the
Central Office Employees who were denied the arrears’ payment. I had asked for the names of all the
employees of the Corporation who were denied the arrears’ payment. Hence the
reply to my query no. 3 is incomplete.
In spite of the
CIC directing them to give a reply to this query, they have not provided the
same. It just proves that the words “going with the spirit of the RTI Act”
stated several times by the CPIO (CO)
and the FAA (CO) don’t really mean anything to them. They are
acting in blatant violation of the rules of the RTI Act, 2005 and defying the
explicit instructions of the CIC. This amounts to Contempt of the Court, in my
opinion.
LIC has not replied, by quoting
that the information asked for cannot be revealed under Section 2(f) of the RTI
Act 2005; as it does not exist as a record under Section 2 (i) of
the RTI Act, 2005. LIC of India has deliberately misinterpreted this Section of the
Act. Information can be any information asked for, by the
appellant.
*Kindly note the following
excerpt from the provisions of the RTI Act, 2005:
4. Obligations
of public authorities:
(1) Every public authority shall—
(a) maintain all its records duly catalogued and
indexed in a manner
and the form which facilitates the right to
information under this Act and
ensure that all records that are appropriate to be
computerised are,
within a reasonable time and subject to
availability of resources,
computerised and connected through a network all
over the country on
different systems so that access to such records is
facilitated.
********************************************************************************
Query no. 15 Documents pertaining to the
Board Meetings of LIC of India wherein this resolution to repudiate arrears of
resigning employees; has been taken. Kindly provide Minutes of the Meetings
with signatures of all the attending members.
The reply given by the FAA is entirely misleading.
He has deliberately misinterpreted my question. I have not received the entire
copy of
the Minutes of the Meetings with signatures of all the attending members.
The CPIO, (CO), Ms. Saroj S. Dikhale, ED(RTI/NPRJ),
LIC of India has given me an incomplete copy of the Minutes of the Meeting.
Only two pages of the 544th Meeting of the Life Insurance
Corporation of India held on 5th August, 2010 at 2.00 p.m. at Hotel
Taj Mahal, Mansingh Road, New Delhi, have been sent to me, with points 21, 22,
23 and 36 (incomplete point). Why
have I not been given the entire Minutes of the Meeting?
***The points
which have been given to me don’t show the resolution to repudiate arrears of
resigning employees.***
The points given to
me are just an incomplete and irrelevant extract. The Minutes of the Meeting
must have the signatures of all the attending members on the last page. I have
not even received that page.
Kindly provide the full
information asked by me in this point no. 15 of my RTI Application.
*Kindly note the following excerpt from the
provisions of the RTI Act, 2005:
Rule 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 stipulates the
Obligations of the Public Authority as follows:
Rule 4,
(1) b (viii) “a statement of the boards, councils, committees and
other bodies consisting of two or more persons
constituted
as its part or for the purpose of its advise, and
as to whether
meetings of those boards, councils, committees and
other
bodies are open to the public, or the minutes of
such
meetings are accessible for public.”
4, 1 (c) publish all relevant facts while formulating
important policies or announcing the
decisions which affect public;
(d) provide reasons for its administrative or quasi
judicial decisions to
affected persons.
Since I am the affected person, I have a right to
access these documents.
In spite of the explicit
direction given by the CIC for this information to be provided by the CPIO/CO,
it has not been given to me completely, by both, the CPIO/CO and the FAA/CO; which
shows utter disregard for the RTI Act, 2005, the CIC and Contempt of Court on
part of the CPIO/CO and the FAA/CO.
**************************************************************************************
21.
a) Does the LIC of India, Staff Regulations, 1960 and
subsequent modifications/amendments therein, if any, contain any
clause wherein it is mentioned that arrears payment after Wage Revision due to
a Charter notification, may be denied to an employee on roll of the LIC of India in the period for which the
Charter has been announced?
b) If so, kindly point out the requisite
provision or clause with adequate, satisfactory explanation/rationale.
c) Does this denial of arrears payment
and difference in retirement benefits, agree in principle, with the labour laws
applicable in India?
Though the IC had
directed the Corporation to provide the rationale as in 21. b) above, for
repudiation of arrears’ payment, the CPIO/CO and the FAA/CO have not given the same. The CPIO/CO has stated
in her letter dt. 06-02-2013 that “File notings regarding wage revision
recommendations of LIC do not exist. Hence the information cannot be provided
as the “record” as defined under Section 2(i) and hence “information” as per
section 2(f) of RTI Act, 2005 does not exist”.
*Kindly note the following excerpt from the
provisions of the RTI Act, 2005:
Rule 4 of the RTI Act, 2005 stipulates the
Obligations of the Public Authority as follows:
4, 1 (c) publish all relevant facts while formulating
important policies or announcing the
decisions which affect public;
(d) provide reasons for its administrative or quasi
judicial decisions to
affected persons.
Since I am the affected person, I have a right to
access these documents.
I request the esteemed IC to consider the
fact that the Corporation which is a trustee of billions of rupees of the
policyholders does not deem it necessary to maintain transparency in its
dealings. It does not provide a rationale for its decisions, which is very
dangerous for a Public Authority of its stature, where millions of employees
and policyholders are being governed by its decisions. It is not behaving in a
responsible and accountable manner.
**************************************************************************************
I have not received all the answers to the queries
asked, in my R.T.I.application
dt. 11-02-2012 . (Question
Nos. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 (partly), 10, 12, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21 b) and 21 c)
have not been answered properly and correctly.)
Though the IC had
directed the Corporation to reply to only 3 out of the 21 questions posed by
me, the Corporation has evaded a clear-cut reply to all of them.
Many other resigning employees like me, have been
deprived of the difference in wages due to the Wage Revision Notification dated
08th October, 2010 and the earlier ones dated 2000 and
2005.
We have also been deprived of the difference in the Retirement Benefits like
Provident Fund and Gratuity and other dues payable to us due to the Wage
Revision as per the said Notifications.
****************************************************************************
*All the information in LIC of India is fully
computerized and is available, but LIC of India does not want to part with the
information. I don’t see any logic in its evasive attitude. I also find it
extremely hard to believe that such important information as the names and
other details of resigning employees have not been collated. If the names and
other details of new recruitments can be maintained by LIC, they must be surely
maintaining the details of the resigning employees too.
Besides,
since huge amounts have been repudiated by LIC in respect of the Arrears Payments
due to such resigning employees since 1st August 1997, surely the
total of this amount will appear in the Balance Sheet of LIC of India, (as a
Liability, if it’s payable) or a Written-off Payment. (if it’s not payable at
all and treated as an Asset). The Annexures to the Balance Sheet will surely
contain the detailed information of the names of the resigning employees, other
relevant details and the amounts repudiated in respect of each one of them. This
will be required by the Inspectors and Auditors of LIC of India.
This negative attitude of such an esteemed Public
Authority like the LIC of India shows that it doesn’t care about the welfare of
its former employees, who have put in long and distinguished years in the
sincere service of the Corporation and does not even respect them.
The ‘internal public’ of the Life Insurance
Corporation of India is the employees and the ‘external public’ is the
policy-holders and the other stake holders. In my opinion, by repudiating the
payment of the Wage Revision Arrears, and other dues and Retirement Benefits
payable on Wage Revision; to the resigning employees, LIC of India has
committed a gross miscarriage of justice and breach of their faith in their
ex-employer.
*******************************************************************************
10. Any other information in support of appeal:
It is interesting to note that the FAA/CO has taken great pains in
unearthing and presenting details of cases involving the RTI Act, 2005 and
decisions regarding why information may not be given by the Public Authority
under this Act. Undoubtedly, the Legal Department of LIC of India has done an
appreciable job on this count by providing him with the necessary details.
Why then,
couldn’t LIC have provided me answers to my Query nos. 5, 6 and 10 which
could’ve been answered by the same Legal department?
Since I was in service on the date from which the
Wage Revision Notification is applicable, that is 1st August 2007, I
am legally entitled to get all my dues from this date to 02-07-2010, the date
of my resignation and hence the last day of my service in L.I.C. of India.
I must be paid this entire amount along with
interest w.e.f. 01-08-2007 till date, at the prevailing rates, as per rules.
I have worked hard, with the utmost sincerity and
loyalty, in L.I.C. of India for eighteen and a half years and have still not
joined any Private Insurance Company due to my deep-rooted loyalty towards
L.I.C. of India.
I must be given justice.
Kindly note, that as per the
letter dt. 09-03-2012, received from the CPIO, in the reply to my
Question No. 3, WZO employees who have resigned from L.I.C. of India and were
denied the arrears’ payment under the Charter dt. 11th October,
2010; my name is not mentioned at all, though I was an employee under the WZO,
working in Pune D.O.1. That itself shows that I am entitled to the arrears’
payment under the Charter dt. 8th October,
2010.
The Life Insurance Corporation of
India is a trustee of billions of rupees of the policyholders does not deem it necessary
to maintain transparency in its dealings. It does not provide a rationale to
its decisions, which is very dangerous for a Public Authority of its stature,
where millions of employees and policyholders are being governed by its
decisions. It is not behaving in a responsible and accountable manner.
If it can get away with repudiating
billions of rupees due to its resigning employees as arrears, since 1997; I
shudder to think about what could happen to the policyholders’ insurance
policies worth billions of rupees, in future? What is the guarantee that such a
huge Reserve Fund is safe with such an insurer that makes decisions arbitrarily
or doesn’t maintain its records meticulously?
I also pity the other employees and
policyholders who must be facing the nightmare of not getting information under
their RTI queries, from LIC of India.
***************************************************************************************
VERY IMPORTANT
I have received the names of 45 employees
(Class I Cadre) who were denied the arrears’ payment by LIC of India in this
Charter dt. 2010; (5 pertaining to the WZO and 40 pertaining to the Central
Office) through this RTI Application. This is incomplete information and the
Corporation is unwilling to part with the statistics pertaining to the
Corporation as a whole. But one can assume that approximately 25 employees of
Class I cadre and 25 employees of the Class II Cadre have been denied the
arrears’ payment in each Divisional Office of LIC of India.
According to the replies of the CPIOs and
the FAAs of the Corporation, to my RTI query no. 3, LIC has 115 Divisional
Offices, 8 Zonal Offices, 9 Audit Centres, Central Office and MDC spread all
over India, thus there are 134 offices of LIC of India. Assuming that 6240
employees have been denied arrears’ payment in this Charter dt. 2010, and an
equal no. of employees have been denied arrears’ payment in the Charters dated
2000 and 2005; approximately18720 employees have been denied arrears’ payment.
If each of these employees was supposed
to have got Rs. 4,00.000/- the amount repudiated totally works out to a
staggering Rs.74,88,000,000/-. (This is a very conservative estimate. The
actual amount may be higher, depending on the actual number of resigning
employees who have been denied arrears payment and difference in Retirement
Benefits; and the revised wages of the resigning employees in the Higher
Management Cadres of LIC of India.)
Where has all this money gone and how has
it been accounted for in LIC of India’s Financial Statements? Has it even been
accounted for, at all, by LIC of India, considering the fact that it does not
have records of repudiated amounts due to its resigning employees as per its own
admission, in reply to my RTI queries?
No wonder, Sri K. Rajivan Nair, Regional
Manager, (CRM/CPIO) WZO, LIC of India, told me in his SELF-PROFESSED “OFF THE
RECORD” phone call to me, FROM THE ZONAL OFFICE LANDLINE NUMBER on 30-03-2012,
that “ASKING FOR ANSWERS FROM LIC IS LIKE BREAKING YOUR HEAD AGAINST A WALL.
LIC WILL NOT ANSWER ANY OF YOUR REMAINING QUESTIONS. WE DO NOT WANT TO OPEN
A PANDORA’S BOX BY REPLYING TO YOUR QUESTIONS.”
***************************************************************************************
11. Prayer/relief sought for:
1.I should be paid all the dues that are payable to
me on account of the Wage Revision, as per the Wage Revision Notification dt. 8th October,
2010 (Applicable for Class-1 Officers of LIC of India) and the
difference in Retirement Benefits like Provident Fund and Gratuity as well as
other dues as per rules of service; with interest
w.e.f. 01-08-2007 till date of actual settlement, at the
prevailing rates, as per rules; by L.I.C.of India.
2.I should be refunded the entire amount of Rs. 2000/- with
interest at the prevailing rates, in respect of the amount that I’ve spent on
this R.T.I. Application and its follow-up; by L.I.C. of India.
3.The CPIO, Mr. K. Rajivan Nair, Regional
Manager (CRM/CPIO) should be fined Rs. 25,000/-; the First
Appellate Authority, Mr. R. R. Dash, Zonal Manager (WZO)/Appellate
Authority;
should be fined for Rs.25000/- as per the
RTI Act, 2005 rules, for not providing all the
information asked for, in my RTI Application dt. 11-02-2012; as per Section 20
of the R.T.I.Act, 2005. They have not provided all the information sought by
me, till date.
The CPIO/CO, LIC of India, Ms. Saroj S. Dikhale, ED(RTI/NPRJ), and the FAA/CO, LIC
of India,
Mr. Sushobhan Sarkar, MD; should be fined for the requisite number
of days as per the RTI Act, 2005 rules, for not
providing all the information asked for, in my RTI Application dt. 11-02-2012;
as per Section 20 of the R.T.I.Act, 2005. They have not
provided all the information sought by me, till date.
4. Censure and
Disciplinary action against the CPIO, Mr. K. Rajivan Nair, Regional
Manager (CRM/CPIO), the FAA, Mr. R. R. Dash, Zonal Manager
(WZO)/Appellate Authority; the CPIO/CO, LIC
of India, Ms. Saroj S. Dikhale,
ED(RTI/NPRJ) and the FAA/CO, LIC of India, Mr. Sushobhan Sarkar, MD;
as per rules of the RTI
Act, 2005.
5. I should receive all
the answers to the queries asked, in my
R.T.I.application
dt. 11-02-2012.
12. Grounds for prayer/relief sought for:
I have worked hard, with the utmost sincerity and
loyalty, in L.I.C. of India for eighteen and a half years and have still not
joined any Private Insurance Company due to my deep-rooted loyalty towards
L.I.C. of India.
I must be given justice.
The Life Insurance Corporation of India must
respect all its employees and not deprive or conspire to deprive them of their
hard-earned, legally rightful dues.
It must not accord differential treatment to its
various classes of employees.
It must respond quickly to its employees’
queries/representations/appeals.
It must overhaul and update its H.R.D. policies.
It must maintain utmost integrity, accountability
and transparency in all its activities.
The R.T.I.Act must be given its rightful respect
and its sanctity must be maintained at all costs.
The Public Authority, LIC of India, and its
designated functionaries, the CPIOs and the FAAs must uphold the
dignity of their Office and maintain integrity, accountability
and transparency. They must also uphold the vision of the
R.T.I. Act, 2005 and not abuse their authority. They must be
more prompt, responsible and co-operative,
so that everyone’s (the Appellant’s, their own and the C.I.C’s) time, money and
efforts are not wasted.
13. Personal Presence at hearing: Yes (If it is through
video-conferencing at Pune.)
14. Declaration:
I hereby state that the information and particulars
given above are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I
also declare that this matter is not previously filed with this Commission nor
is pending with any Court or Tribunal or Authority.
Place: Pune-411021
Date: 27-03-2013
Signature of appellant
INDEX OF APPEAL/COMPLAINT
of Mrs.Priya Ramesh Swaminathan dated 27-03-2013 with CIC
1. Particulars Page Sr. No. from/ to
2. Original second appeal to CIC dt.
27-03-2013
3. Chronology chart of RTI application
4. Copy of RTI application dated-11-02-2012 with its
enclosures.
5. Copy of the CIC decision dt.
04-01-2013
6.. Copy of first appeal dated 19-02-2013
7. Copy of proof of mailing first appeal Speed Post
No. EM395861814IN/WEIGHT 48 GMS/RS.34/-/25-02-2013 TO SRI
SUSHOBHAN SARKER, FAA, CO, LIC OF INDIA, MUMBAI
COPY TO MS. SAROJ S. DIKHALE, CPIO, CO, LIC OF INDIA, MUMBAI
/EM395861893IN/WEIGHT 48 GMS/RS.34/-/25-02-2013
COPY TO MRS. DEEPAK SANDHU, IC, CIC’S OFFICE, NEW DELHI/EM395861859IN/WEIGHT
48 GMS/RS.34/-/25-02-2013
8. Postal A.D. card/Acknowledgement letter, received
from FAA Not received from FAA.
9. Copy of decision of CPIO dated 06-02-2013 -received by
me on 14-02-2013
10. Copy of decision of FAA dated
16-03-2013- received by me on 21-03-2013
11. Proof of mailing second
appeal to CPIO and FAA
Place: Pune
Date: 02-04-2013
No comments:
Post a Comment